Talk:Cellist
This page should be integrated with cello. Why? *(1)
- Both are stubs which probably won't get too much bigger in the near future.
- This page goes against Wikipedia:Naming conventions. It should at least be moved to cellist.
I'll wait a bit to do this, since it seems like it's under construction at the moment. -- Merphant 11:38 Nov 15, 2002 (UTC)
- I agree with you. There are quite a few paired articles like this (oboe/oboist, trombone/trombonist and so on) and I think there are basically two ways to deal with them:
- Have just one page at oboe (or wherever) which includes a list of players of that instrument
- Have one page at oboe and another at List of famous oboists
- My feeling is that until the list of players gets long (half a dozen at the very least), everything should go on the one page. --Camembert 12:23 Nov 15, 2002 (UTC)
- (1) I disagree with this User:David Martland as a cellist is definitely not a cello! I have introduced a number of instrument/player pairs today - I do agree with Camembert (see below) that if there are not very many players they could form part of an entry on the instrument concerned - but this depends rather on the instrument. I think that pianos, violins, and a few other instruments are sufficiently important to have their own pages. I could probably make a case for most of the other instruments too - given time.
I'm still feeling my way around here, and the working practices - DM.
Start a discussion about improving the Cellist page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Cellist" page.
