Talk:De-Anne Kelly

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal De-Anne Kelly is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Untitled

Hi Adam: Why did you revert my edit? Which part did you consider illiterate . I merely restructured the article a bit and added an external link and info about her family. I revert it back for now, please let me know your specific complaints, so we can work it out. -- chris_73 00:07, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)

I am writing articles about all members of the House of Representatives. They conform to a pattern. Other users are of course free to add material, but not to make the existing text ungrammatical and irrelevant sentences:

De-Anne Margaret Kelly (born 21 March 1954) is a member of the Australian House of Representatives for the National Party since March 1996. This sentence is ungrammatical.

She was reelected in 1998 and 2001. This sentence is irrelevant. Obviously if she was elected in 1996 she has been re-elected since.

She is representing the Division of Dawson, Queensland. This sentence is ungrammatical.

She was born in Rockhampton, Queensland, and was educated at the University of Queensland. She was a business proprietor, cattle producer and sugar-cane farmer before entering politics.

Ms. Kelly is married to her husband Roger and has a son Ian, named after her late father. This sentence is trivial, and we don't use personal titles like "Ms".

Kelly has been Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Transport and Regional Services and Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Trade since October 2003.

Adam 00:23, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)

OK, step by step now for each sentence:

First sentence: Not sure what exactly is ungrammatical, but either way is fine by me.
She was reelected in 1998 and 2001 People sometimes DO lose office, and then get elected again.
What is the grammatical difference between She is representing the Division of Dawson, Queensland (my version) and ... representing the Division of Dawson, Queensland (your version)?
She was born in Rockhampton ... OK by both of us.
Ms. Kelly is married... Not trivial, but biographical information. Ms can be changed, no problem.
Last sentence OK again.

Summary: If you insist on your structure, then that is fine by me. Yet I think your text is as ungrammatical as mine, although I think both are not bad. Finally: Marriage status and Reelections are information that can be included in a encyclopedia. I'll let your article stand and add only the marriage & reelection info. Is this acceptable for you? -- chris_73 00:39, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)

If you can't see that De-Anne Margaret Kelly (born 21 March 1954) is a member of the Australian House of Representatives for the National Party since March 1996 is ungrammatical you shouldn't be editing an encyclopaedia. It should read De-Anne Margaret Kelly (born 21 March 1954) has been a member of the Australian House of Representatives for the National Party since March 1996. Adam 01:01, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Comment about grammar of first sentence accepted, comment about "... shouldn't be editing an encyclopaedia" ignored. Calm down. I think we ended up with an article that is better now than it was before. Current version is fine for me. I also added a redirect from her full name. -- chris_73 01:13, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on De-Anne Kelly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:58, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]