Talk:Helen Garner

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Helen Garner article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Australia: Literature Low‑importance

	Australia portal Helen Garner is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian literature (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Critical reception

From the article

Critics in her home country Australia are divided as to the merit of Garner's work. Mainstream publications regard her as one of Australia's finest writers, but underground thinkers dismiss her work entirely.

Would you like to cite some evidence for the claim about "underground thinkers"? I know that The First Stone made her persona non grata amongst some feminists, but the article's claim is considerably wider. --Robert Merkel 00:58, 12 Aug 2003 (UTC)

The First Stone

To the non-logged in contributor from Melbourne University who originated this article, I have decided to split off a seperate article on The First Stone. If I recall correctly, the criticism of the book was considerably more multi-pronged than what was stated, and a more complete analysis would be more appropriate for a seperate article IMO.

By the way, have you considered getting an account here? You can use a pseudonym if you want. --Robert Merkel 07:19, 13 Aug 2003 (UTC)

'La Mama: The Story of a Theatre' edit

Cosmolino edited: Non-fiction writing - 'removed incorrext attribution of a book'. I assume good faith about Cosmolino's edit. OK, so it is a fact that Garner is not the sole author of the book. However - see the results of a Google of 'Jones Burstall Garner "La Mama"' - if Garner is not considered a co-author, she's at least a named contributor to the book.
Cosmolino's edit also muddled a few links - fixed them. --Shirt58 13:37, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links

There is something peculiar about the External Links. The link provided doesn't match what the text says it is, plus I can't quite understand what Peter Craven has to do with Kerryn Goldsworthy. Will try to research the Meanjin in question (in the coming weeks) but to the best of my knowledge Meanjin articles are not available online as this external link implies. Sterry2607 (talk) 12:14, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Silly me ... months later I've worked out what was wrong and fixed it - the link was to a bio and the bio included refs to Craven and Goldsworthy.Sterry2607 (talk) 02:26, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions please

If there is anyone out there looking at this article I'd be interested in ideas re how to structure it. Garner's career is so diverse and she has been attended by such controversy (and varied opinion) that it is hard to work out how best to organise an article about her. I'm happy to do more work on it, but I wonder how best to proceed. I also suspect that more of her books should have their own pages - particularly MONKEY GRIP, JOE CINQUE'S CONSOLATION.Sterry2607 (talk) 02:26, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the novels and non-fiction works need pages of their own. Separating these out might allow you to see the rest of the page more clearly. Just a thought. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 07:14, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Perry...I'll try to get back to it in a week or two and see what I can do.Sterry2607 (talk) 10:07, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

True Stories: Selected Non-fiction

I own this book and have been studying it at school. It's very interesting and contains a lot of information regarding the backstory behind many of her works and thoughts on writing. When I get around to it I may make an article/edit some articles to incorporate this. Avnas Ishtaroth _{drop me a line} 03:49, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photo required?

A BOT has added a category tag indicating that this article no longer requires a photo. This is not the case as no photo of the author is present in the main article. I'm removing the catgeory tag as a result. -- Perry Middlemiss (talk) 00:37, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliography

I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. Feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 11:14, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Helen Garner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070704212250/http://www.walkleys.com/component/option%2Ccom_dbquery/Itemid%2C29/task%2CExecuteQuery/qid%2C2/ to http://www.walkleys.com/component/option%2Ccom_dbquery/Itemid%2C29/task%2CExecuteQuery/qid%2C2/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:56, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Helen Garner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:31, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]