Talk:Slap bass

This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)
Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.
Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

Name of technique

This technique is referred to as "slap and pop" or "slap-and-pop," not "slap-back." Slap-back is usually used to refer to an undesireable form of echo. Proposal: move page to Slap and pop. Badagnani 23:33, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No! I propose a move to slap bass, avoiding that issue (in the article title at least) and using the most popular name for the technique. - furrykef (Talk at me) 16:39, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i propose either. i have never heard of "slap back" style bass. okay, i'm just moving the bloody thing to Slap bass. i have nevr heard "slap back" in my life. if anyone objects, let's get a discussion going before we move it back, because there seems to be an evident consensus (of us four at least). also, mention popping more. Joeyramoney 05:52, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This makes no sense

The article is called Slap Back, yet slap back is never used in the article, then the heading: Slap Bass has 'also commonly know as slap bass' underneath it!? 84.71.1.112 10:13, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

changed! Joeyramoney 06:07, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

long lost twin article

it seems this page was originally started by a frail young n00b (or more aptly, one time IP user) who did not see the article Slapping. unfortunately, nor did anyone else who edited this page. a redirect is very clearly in order, but this seemed almost too ridiculous to be true that there were two articles on the exact same thing, so i would rather someone else red. this than i, to affirm that i'm not seeing s&#t. Joeyramoney 06:14, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

okay, i redirected it. Joeyramoney 18:14, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]