Jump to content

Talk:Amersfoort

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More history needed

[edit]

I moved some text and one picture around.

I think the layout of the page needs more work.

A little more history would be nice.

--Henk Langeveld 22:57, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WWII

[edit]

I am deleting the sentence about how many good people died at the concentration camp. It's not for us to judge wether they are good or not. That's POV. If someone could get a name for the concentration camp, that would be good as well. - Big Brother is Watching (talk) 15:36, 18 June 2005

Approved by Amersfoort citizen! TheDatim (talk) 21:31, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

[edit]

I think the people with their last names both 'Vogel' are not really notable people born in Amersfoort. It happens a lot lately that people like to put their names up there. --Pietpiet (talk) 06:02, 13 February 2007

Agreed, I never even heard from him, and I'm from here. TheDatim (talk) 21:32, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

A link has recently been made from this Amersfoort article to the article Amer River. However, the Amer in the WP article appears to be nowhere near Amersfoort. Is it a case of two rivers with the same name: a modern-day river named Amer in North Brabant province; and the Eem, formerly named the Amer, in Utrecht province, the river in question in this Amersfoort article? papageno (talk) 16:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, this is a incorrect link which should be "Eem". The Eem was named Amer but is now called Eem. However, ther stil apears to be a short river (12km) called Amer. this is NOT the same as the Eem. Greetings Matthias92 (talk) 09:29, 10 June 2008 (UTC) (from Amersfoort)[reply]

Image needs replacement

[edit]

Hello all...

An image used in the article, specifically Image:Amersfoortse Kei.jpg, has a little bit of a licensing issue. The image was uploaded back when the rules around image uploading were less restrictive. It is presumed that the uploader was willing to license the picture under the GFDL license but was not clear in that regard. As such, the image, while not at risk of deletion, is likely not clearly licensed to allow for free use in any future use of this article. If anyone has an image that can replace this, or can go take one and upload it, it would be best.

You have your mission, take your camera and start clicking.--Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:54, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really feel like taking the picture but if you can't keep the old one... Or is there another one on Commons? If neccesery I can take it. (I live down there in Amersfoort...) Kind regards, Matthias92 (talk) 20:57, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I shall take the picture, it's only a small detour on my way home. :) TheDatim (talk) 21:33, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That would be great, The Datim, thanks. --papageno (talk) 21:11, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Henricus Zoesius

[edit]

The text below was added accidentally to the article text. I have moved it here.

Notable residents
Here should be added:
Zoesius, Henricus (1571-1627)
who was a noted jurisprudent, later Professor at Louvain University. Some of his works are even to day of interest and are reprinted or digitalisided.

I don't see this person listed on the Dutch WP article about notable residents (at nl:Lijst van Amersfoorters). Lots of Google search results about his books, but I didn't see anything to say he was from Amersfoort (and admittedly quick skim on my part). --papageno (talk) 15:28, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think we should, unless he provides a link with evidence. TheDatim (talk) 21:35, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Amersfoort. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:13, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amersfoort. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:32, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]