Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Number 777
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 21:47, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Shouldn't this be deleted or re-written? I think it should because of its heavily religious standpoint that might cheer some, but offend others. --WikiFan04 13:02, 26 Mar 2005 (CST)
- Comment: this looked like a copyvio [1], but the site says its stuff is in the public domain. The topic is worthy of an article, but nevertheless, the article is unwikified and POV. This should be edited, not deleted. --bainer 09:09, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Move → Number of the divine and cleanup. The variety of biblical referrences justifies a numerology article on the subject (see Number of the Beast (numerology)), but the name Number 777 conflicts with all the other number articles. --Allen3 13:57, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
- I don't see too much salvageable here. It's hopelessly POV, and almost all the references it makes are to the number 7, not 777. Reads like the sort of religious dogma that turns everything around to prove black is white. Anything that is slightly useful can be moved/merged to 777 (number). -R. fiend 06:18, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and allow for organic growth. --GRider\talk 18:50, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete content, and mark as requested article. Radiant_* 15:24, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete for reasons already stated. PatGallacher 23:47, 2005 Mar 31 (UTC)
- Keep. The article should be edited, not deleted. --Eleassar777 12:57, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. POV and original research: "To some people the triple sevens (777) numerically symbolise Yahweh, the Father of Yeshua the Messiah." Where is the source for this? / Uppland 12:44, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: What exactly is the consensus on this, then? --WikiFan04ß 19:48, 5 Apr 2005 (CDT)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.