This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This redirect is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Luke Rhinehart was copied or moved into George Cockcroft with this edit on November 11, 2011. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
I do have the legal wherewithal to post this. There is a similar article on h2g2, which I also wrote. No copyright breach here. -Martin
Surely his email address shouldn't be in here. - David Gerard 00:38, Jan 23, 2004 (UTC)
Any particular reason why not? I did ask him for permission, and he said he wasn't bothered. Martin 00:51, 23 Jan 2004 (UTC)
Ah, OK then :-) - David Gerard 01:05, Jan 23, 2004 (UTC)
I deleted his email address - its not encyclopaedic, and there's no particular reason why it should be there. MNo other author has his email address on their page!Mofs (talk) 21:18, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know what definition of encyclopedic you're using that excludes email addresses, but I can think of a few reasons to keep it there (as if the fact that you can't ends the discussion) -- I was looking for it. I've reverted your change, pending a discussion here. Llamabr (talk) 03:34, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]