Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neopointillism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Xezbeth 14:24, May 7, 2005 (UTC)
No evidence of notability. --fvw* 02:12, 2005 Apr 28 (UTC)
- I didn't see any either. While I was cleaning it up, I googled "pxlart" and got, like, 40 hits total.
- Delete, not notable. Megan1967 05:18, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, redirect to Pointillism. Radiant_* 09:42, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to pointillism. --Eleassar777 10:15, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to pointillism. Klonimus 03:55, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, plenty of art movements spawn a neo-xxx version some 50 yrs after they were popular. But as far as I can tell it hasn't yet happened for pointillism in any serious way. Pxlart use of the term seems to be a Neo-logism or an art movement of one. But also delete the article behind the redirect at Neo-pointillism -- Solipsist 12:57, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Ever seen pictures or graphics that were pixelated? Thats electronic Neopointillism. Very influential artistic movement on the internet. Klonimus 03:55, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable, possible neologism. Do not redirect. There's no evidence that this term is ever used, so redirect would falsely give WP's stamp of approval on a vanity neologism. "neopointillism" gives twelve google hits, and several of them are WP. Quale 22:08, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.