User talk:Arrgy

Please do not blank articles. It is considered to be vandalism. Can I ask you why you are so offended by this article, which is factual, descriptive, and neutral in tone, and about a real phenomenon? -- Karada 18:45, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers for tips on writing and editing here. -- Infrogmation 18:50, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I reverted your vandalism of the BDSM article because, moral or not, this is a perfectly valid subject for inclusion in an encyclopedia. Please stop blanking articles (including talk pages), this is considered vandalism and will result in your being blocked from editing wikipedia. JeremyA 04:08, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It most certainly is not. How can we ever hope to remove such an unholy act from our Creator's Earth if we continue to let people know about it? And how dare you refer to doing God's Work as vandalism and threaten to ban me for it! Arrgy 04:35, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I have never read any scripture showing that any God wanted to censure information. If you had something concise to say to discourage people with beliefs similar to yours from behaving in a certain way, such might have a place as a sub-heading under BDSM, so long as it maintained a neutral point of view. When you behave so arrogantly as to just demand that people not know about things, you should expect to be ignored at best. --Douglas 14:18, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]