Talk:HNLMS De Ruyter (1935)
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HNLMS De Ruyter (1935) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Redirects
[edit]The link to the list of ships of this name seems to send me back to this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PaulinSaudi (talk • contribs) 10:30, 22 December 2004
Question
[edit]This passage:
"However, due to the cost-cutting policy that went into her design, De Ruyter was not quite up to her task. Her main battery (7 × 150 mm guns) was underpowered in comparison to other light cruisers of the time (for example the British Leander class), and the class had inadequate armour as well and lacked long range anti-aircraft guns. However, her fire control system was excellent."
This seems unnecessarily belittling. She has one main gun less than a Leander which is a thousand tons heavier and one main gun more than an Arethusa which is a thousand tons lighter. Both classes receive glowing articles on this wiki. She can't be called undergunned.
Categories:
- B-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- C-Class Dutch military history articles
- Dutch military history task force articles
- C-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- C-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- B-Class Netherlands articles
- All WikiProject Netherlands pages
- B-Class Shipwreck articles
- Low-importance Shipwreck articles