Talk:Atrial flutter

Physiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has not yet been associated with a particular area.

Medicine: Cardiology Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Cardiology task force (assessed as High-importance).

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Atrial flutter.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Untitled

AFFIRM specifically enrolled patients with atrial fibrillation, not flutter. The trial has no place in this article. If you are aware of a trial that looked at mortality outcomes with atrial flutter (cardioversion vs. rate-control) I would like to read it. Axl 20:33, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)

An image of the action of the heart during flutter would greatly improve this article. Exploding Boy 23:50, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Symptoms section appears to be missing some text at the start

I've addressed the symptoms section... I would argue that it should be kept pretty simple. The issue of AV conduction block needs to be dealt with somewhere early in the mechanism section and not just at the end in the section on treatment with rate control... I'll try to come back and address this soon.Toombes 03:11, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ECG criteria

doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.06.013 - ECG criteria need revising; F waves in the frontal plane are the most specific. JFW | T@lk 14:32, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History

PMID 9083886 JFW | T@lk 11:30, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quicker: doi:10.1111/j.1540-8167.1997.tb00799.x JFW | T@lk 11:33, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Questions to help clarify article

This is from the article:

Catheter ablation of the isthmus is a procedure usually available in the electrophysiology laboratory. Eliminating conduction through the isthmus prevents reentry, and if successful, prevents the recurrence of the atrial flutter. Type II flutter follows a significantly different re-entry pathway to type I flutter, and is typically faster, usually 340–430 beats/minute.

1) Is catheter ablation specifically relevant to type I or does it also apply to type II? Mention of ablation after type I suggests to me the former.

2) "Available in the electrophysiology laboratory" Why in a laboratory as opposed to a hospital or clinic? Is the terminology geographically specific? In at least some places in Canada, the procedure is done in a hospital.

Thanks, CBHA (talk) 01:41, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The current article wording (June 2009) includes: "Because of the reentrant nature of atrial flutter, it is often possible to ablate the circuit that causes atrial flutter. " The Wikipedia note on "reentrant" gives 3 senses, none of which fit here. What does reentrant mean in this article? Thanks. CBHA (talk) 17:02, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]