User talk:Usedbook

Welcome to Wikipedia! I think you'll find it a fun project to work on. As you can see, our Buddhism articles need quite a bit of work, so a Theravada monk-in-training is most welcome (several monks in to South Korea tried to recruit me, but I thought my Anglicanism would get in the way. :). If you need any help, check out Wikipedia:Help and the FAQs. If you need to ask a question, drop by the Wikipedia:Village pump. Cheers! -- Stephen Gilbert 01:28 Mar 17, 2003 (UTC)

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

You wrote "HealthCanada reports: 160 Canadian cases of SARS as of Apr02"

To be precise, HealthCanada is reporting 62 probable and 98 suspect cases of SARS. The WHO table only includes probable cases (except for the US as noted), and that explains why 160 isn't the number reported. -º¡º

Thanks for your work on Bodhi. It's good to see the improvement :)

Could you explain one of the phrases you use? What does 'when all karma has been burnt.' mean? I have very little knowledge of Buddhism so the phrase is unclear to me.

Regards -- sannse 18:59 Apr 10, 2003 (UTC)

Use the Move this page feature to change an article title. Cutting and pasting the content leaves the edit history behind, which is bad. Mkweise 01:18 22 May 2003 (UTC)

Hi, Usedbook. See User talk:Mkweise and Wilkipedia:Village Pump for the details, but I've moved Theravada around, and plan to do the others in a few hours, so long as there are no objections to it. Hope that helps. Tannin 03:37 22 May 2003 (UTC)

Hi! Sorry for the delay, I've been out of town and away from the computer. The move in Pali canon sounds like a good idea to me; I'm really not very knowledgable on the subject, and was basing my earlier redirects solely on information I found in the articles as they stood when I first read them. Hephaestos 12:55 28 May 2003 (UTC)

Left a comment for you on Talk:Moment_of_silence Kat 18:01 11 Jun 2003 (UTC)

Greetings, and sorry for the late reply‹I had been spending way too much time on Wikipedia and had to go cold turkey for a while. The nicest images I've seen are at [1], but unfortunately those are subject to copyright. I ended up just using google image searches to find images that can resonably be assumed to be unencumbered by copyrights. Mkweise

---

Welcome. Please review Wikipedia:WikiProject_Islam and help remove the bias that has built up here due to lack of Muslim help editing. Please also recruit scholars and fellow Muslims to ensure scholarly accuracy. Perhaps we must all re-read The Muqadimmah! - an anonymous Asharite

Your comments on editing pages are noted. I was aware I do this and having been trying to minimise edits, but it seems to something a personal style, so it will be difficult. I've only just started editing Wikipedia so it is part of the learning curve I would imagine.

Also is it so much of a problem? If you view page history you can compare all my edits as a whole against the last version by someone else. :ChrisG 12:00, 30 Oct 2003 (UTC)

Hello. You asserted that archaeologists know nothing of the Qu'ran as it is not within the scope of their work. This is untrue, as the search for and examination of manuscripts is of course a significant part of archaeology with cultures which possess writing, like Arabia of 1500 years ago. Are you familiar with the excellent article on Qu'ranic paleography which appeared in the Atlantic Monthy a couple of years ago? It dealt with the discovery of some Qu'ranic manuscripts in, I believe, Yemen which differ noticably from the redaction with which Muslims are acquainted with today. Kricxjo 02:17, 4 Nov 2003 (UTC)

I just wanted to tell you how happy I was to see that the entry on "Hinayana" discussed the fact that the term is a pejorative. It is always irritating to see people unknowingly adopt partisan language in academic discussions. So, thanks. Patrick Grey Anderson 22:31, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Usedbook, you have been very annoying with your Mani prophet. "The last prophet" or "The seal of prophets" never refers to anyone other than Muhammad. Please refrain yourself from editing this pages unless you are 100% sure and confident about your knowledge about the issue. Please consult with other users to enhance your knowledge. --Hiwamy 18:55, 20 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Looking for help on a major wiki project

Hey :) I was wondering if you'd be interesting in helping out with www.Knowmore.org, a corporation search wiki we're trying to get off the ground. We could DEFINATELY use some people that know how to make a wiki community great & the site is almost a blank slate at this point. It's been heavily customized and is designed to help responsible consumers enter any product or company name and immediatly find information about that co. (the main focus of the wiki is corporate & political information in a much more specialized way then wikipedia currently offers) Let me know if you're interested! aim: knowmoreorg or bernard@knowmore.org

Hello, i borrowed your 'imaginary friend' userbox. I hope you don't mind. -- User:Belthil

about vijaya

sorry about this late reply well, regarding my old article on vijaya, eventhough i wrote that article through my personal research etc, many other users felt that the article wasn't good enough so i just decided to give up on it, but if you would like to re-write it, i would be happy to help :)

Userbox Public Transit

According to Wikipedia:The German solution, here’s a a tip for you: {{User:Olve/Userboxes/Public transport}} (in lieu of the blanked template:User Public Transit). -- Olve 22:30, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Buddhist pilgrimage sites

Hi Usedbook -

I have three questions about your identification of [Buddhist pilgrimage] sites:

You identify that "the Buddha spoke of holy sites that followers may seek." Where did the Buddha say this? For instance, in which sutta?
You write that one of the holy sites that the Buddha mentioned was Kusinara, where he passed away. Did he mention this before he passed way (for instance, somewhere in the Mahaparinibbana Sutta) or somehow after he passed away?
Your edit summary comment states, "Pilgrimage is central to the path." What path are you talking about? The Noble Eightfold Path?

Thanks for any clarification/education/citations. LarryR 22:57, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. I really like your userboxes :-)

Hi Usedbook -

Fantastic!!! Thanks for the education! Would it be okay if one of us (you? me?) added the Thanissaro (1998) reference in an endnote or in-line link at Pilgrimage#Buddhism? (By the way, I'm totally impressed that you were able to link directly to the paragraph in question!)

FWIW, not to put too fine a point on it, my concern about "central to the path" was not so much about the text you included and then subsequently deleted but about the so-called "edit summary" ("Pilgrimage is central to the path. removing some previous writing") that you wrote when deleting the modifier ("Although pilgrimage is not central to the path, ..."). Sounds like we're on the same page though.

Honestly, my initial question issued forth from my own Theravada householder practice. Seeing your reference made me wonder to what degree is pilgrimmage part of traditional householder practice, what's the source, what's the rationale. You've definitely helped a great deal with your answer here. Thanks so much again.

In addition, the Ven. Mettanando Bhikkhu article you referenced looks excellent! Maybe should be added as an endnote to the Wikipedia Mahaparinibbana Sutta article (which, now that I just looked at it, needs some development!) -- some day?

Mahametta!

LarryR 15:34, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Einstein quotation

Hello Usedbook. I was researching the Einstein quotation you have on your user page to include in a forthcoming book on Buddhism, and found that Wikiquote flags it as misattributed. It occurred to me that you might (a) wish to know this (b) be able to research it a bit more. I shall try to track down the Helen Dukas book mentioned there. Incidentally, the grammar in the final sentence doesn't look like the work of a professional translator to me. That sort of thing is sometimes a giveaway. Regards --Shantavira 14:36, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Usedbook. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Usedbook. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Usedbook. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Last prophet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mani. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revert at Suvarnabhumi Airport

The airline no longer operates the route as it is no longer available booking on their website. 05:28, 31 August 2023 (UTC) 47.13.131.183 (talk) 05:28, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for our contribution, 47.13.131.183. There was a misunderstanding but all is good now. Thank you. Usedbook (talk) 03:54, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Preto River (Amapá) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Preto River (Amapá). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 17:32, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Familicide: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. ––– GMH MELBOURNE 14:00, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@GMH Melbourne: This is very appreciated, thank you. Usedbook (talk) 14:06, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, also see WP:Redwarn, a tool that makes this a lot easier. ––– GMH MELBOURNE 14:09, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Venezuelan War of Independence

Hello, I recently made a change to a page that had two duplicate paragraphs, deleting one. Sorry for not explaining! 2601:189:8002:4E0:25DF:65DE:F36F:F783 (talk) 14:14, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know, I see now and will make the correction. Usedbook (talk) 14:18, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vajrayogini

Please do not "fix" things you don't understand. While Vajrayogini has the word "yogini" included, in Tibetan Buddhism, the term yogini refers to a human female practitioner, while the term dakini refers to a female deity. The terms are not interchangable. Vajrayogini, like most higher tantric deities, is considered a Buddha, which you removed. I reverted you edit for these reasons. Skyerise (talk) 12:27, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Skyerise: Firstly, the message you've left here comes across as rude. We are all trying to understand here. The introduction at Vajrayogini requires a facelift to bring clarity to the reader and perhaps the Tara article can be of some inspiration. Vajrayogini is important in Vajrayana but the article needs to also reflect it's origins in India, how it is regarded in Hinduism, and especially other Buddhist traditions from a neutral point of view when possible. A section for etymology is missing. Vajrayogini acts as a meditation deity and, according to Britannica, the "female embodiment of the cognitive function leading to Buddhahood" - to bring a third party perspective. At the root is a yogini, regardless of one's spiritual practice or beliefs. One can easily say "Buddha and a ḍākiṇī" is contradictory also and for the record. I'm not interested in pursuing my own editing on the article so please be assured, I'm not here to argue. Vajrayogini is considered a female Buddha in Vajrayana (no problem) but, for many other practitioners, this is not the case or is slightly different and should be reflected in the article's introductory paragraph. The Tara article is a better example. I look forward to working with you on our article. Also, it was a quick edit as I was rushed off the computer for many hours (haven't made an edit since) so perhaps I should have waited and took more time for consideration. My apologies for this, Skyerise. I can see how my edit can be problematic. Usedbook (talk) 15:40, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies if my comment came off as rude. I've taken your suggestions and rewritten the lead. However, unlike Tara, Vajrayogini is original to Vajrayana and while inspired by Hindu tantra, is not derived from a pre-existing Hindu deity as Tara was. She is exclusive to Vajrayana and does not appear in non-Vajrayana traditions. One could also say that calling Tara both a Buddha and a Bodhisattva is contradictory, but it isn't. All Vajrayana deities represent both the path and the result. Thus Tara represents both the path of the Bodhisattva and the result of becoming a female Buddha, while Vajrayogini represents the path of the dakini and its result of becoming a female Buddha. Again, a yogini is a human practitioner of yoga, primarily understood as physical yoga such as Hatha yoga, and the article linked is pretty clear about that. Yogini is primarily used in a Hindu context: dakini in that context means something more like witch; in a Buddhist context, yogini may refer to a human female practitioner, but never to a female deity; deities are differentiated by using the word dakini. Sometimes female practitioners will call themselves "dakinis", but this is a misuse of the word. Skyerise (talk) 10:32, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Arcline Investment Management

Hello Usedbook,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Arcline Investment Management for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 23:24, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

I noticed you have been editing some health-related articles recently; thanks for that. A bunch of us hang out at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine. You're welcome to join us if that's an area of editing that interests you, or if you ever have questions about finding good sources for medical content or writing style. Feel free to put the group's page on your watchlist, or stop by to say hello some time. WhatamIdoing (talk) 18:13, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rempo Niwa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shizuoka.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arcline Investment Management for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arcline Investment Management is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arcline Investment Management until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 12:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, du Scheiß grünes Männchen aus — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.201.186.247 (talk) 03:09, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]