Talk:William Redfern
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Untitled
[edit]I'm not sure that William Redfern would want to be called a physician. In the English tradition, there was a social and training difference between physicians (upper class) and surgeons (almost tradesmen - associated with barbers). Thortful 11:57, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- It's not going to be a perfect match, because our categories refer to terms as they are understood today, not as they were understood two centuries ago. It would be super-confusing to have two different "surgeon" categories for instance, one based on a meaning that has generally passed out of the language. Stan 16:25, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Australia articles
- Mid-importance Australia articles
- C-Class Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history articles
- Mid-importance Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history articles
- Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (military) articles
- Low-importance biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- C-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles