Talk:Post-autistic economics
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion on 2006-08-13. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Q of an occasional wikipedia user (& afficionado): what's the boundary criterion to be included in wikipedia; as in: degree of absurdity resp. irrelevancy of a topic to be excluded? (seriously). just wondering, A Lang/16Dec04
I direct you to Mark Evans (Harry Potter).
- True, there are some things way off anyone's interest. This particular topic isn't really fringe by WP standards: there is a P.A.E. newsletter (which I read for a while, as en Ex-Econ student) and a webpage.J heisenberg 17:43, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Relation to behavioral economics
[edit]It seems to me that many of the criticisms levelled by the post-autistic economics camp have been made to considerable effect-- and with less denigration of the economics mainstream-- by behavioral economists. I'm going to insert a sentence pointing readers to behavioral economics in the text of the article. Tobacman 22:16, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- you should have gotten a source that says there's a link. Popish Plot (talk) 21:10, 27 February 2015 (UTC)