Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blood Has Been Shed
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE — Gwalla | Talk 3 July 2005 03:09 (UTC)
This is stupid, self-promoting article. move along nothing to seeehere. Alea yacta est. Project2501a 00:25, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. By the way, you mean "promoting" and alea jacta est. ;) --Dante Alighieri | Talk 00:27, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
- it's 3:30 in the morning, standard greece time, i got a nasty php heizenbug and THERE'S NO DEBUGGER FOR PHP. Printf debugging is to fucking high-school!!! so yeah, i meant what you said. Project2501a 00:32, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete — vanity. BLANKFAZE | (что??) 00:28, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Talk about not being notable... AngryParsley 00:30, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- OK. Well, it's kind of depressing really. I mean, I always wanted to be somebody, you know? And I.. oh, wait... --Dante Alighieri | Talk 00:32, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep — maybe - a quick google shows they are a real band but the page does need a heck of a good rewrite. Mariocki 00:38, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Nobody cares about the existence of such a band. --webkid 18:41, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
keep it there an amazing band you dicks. unsigned vote by 24.52.162.85 (talk · contribs)
- Delete. Vanity. Nobodies, not worthy of an entry. Herrhav0k 14:14, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
keep this is a valid article, just needs expanding. Not liking the band, or the name of the band is not reason enough for this article to go unsigned vote by 146.87.193.40 (talk · contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.