Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew danks
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy delete, request by creator. Thue | talk 21:20, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It's either vanity or an advertisement. Either way, it doesn't belong. Xcali 02:35, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete When will fourteen year olds realize that nothing remotely interesting has ever happened in their life? --EvilZak 02:37, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing against Andrew Danks, but no encyclopedic notability. Sjakkalle 09:21, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]- Speedy delete now that the author has requested it be removed. Sjakkalle 07:12, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I have a feeling nobody will be looking up Andrew Danks on Wikipedia anytime soon. Totally irrelevant. <3 to Danks :D R Lee E 09:28, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, most of the info is either unverifiable or highly POV (or both). If he's some young entrepreneur, I'd like some sources to back it up in which case a new pages can be created without prejudice. Mgm|(talk) 18:29, May 25, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete kid vanity. - Etacar11 20:04, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Userfy if the editor wants to join the project, otherwise Delete--misunderstanding/no hard feelings. Niteowlneils 20:52, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Autobiographies/ advertisements are not welcome on Wikipedia. --Hoovernj 21:25, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.