Talk:National parks of the United Kingdom

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Protected areas Start‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Start‑class Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England B‑class Top‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geography Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

We could discuss on this page differences in the park systems if there are any. Anyone familiar with UK national parks. Rmhermen 23:02, Jun 29, 2004 (UTC)

Im slightly familiar but i dont really care. which park system did you mean —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.20.154.205 (talk) 19:32, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on National parks of the United Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20121223174220/http://www.nationalparks.gov.uk/aboutus/about_anpa to http://www.nationalparks.gov.uk/aboutus/about_anpa

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:11, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on National parks of the United Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121001063520/http://www.nationalparks.gov.uk/learningabout/whatisanationalpark/nationalparksareprotectedareas/iucncategories.htm to http://www.nationalparks.gov.uk/learningabout/whatisanationalpark/nationalparksareprotectedareas/iucncategories.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:05, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Map requires updating

Since it was produced, the South Downs AONB and the East Hampshire AONB have ceased to exist and been succeeded - with different boundaries - by the larger South Downs National Park, the Cairngorms National Park has extended its territory considerably to the south and both the Lake District and Yorkshire Dales national parks have extended their territories such that they now meet one another. Also there is no such national park as the 'South York Moors' - it should be the 'North York Moors'. Perhaps Paul@wikitravel or some other party could be persuaded to provide an updated version of this lovely map. cheers Geopersona (talk) 18:27, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Still hopeful someone can update this map. cheers Geopersona (talk) 20:50, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And perhaps on a more up-to-date background than the pre-'74 counties? cheers Geopersona (talk) 17:19, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Greater London Notional Park

The idea of a national park covering London was more of a profile-raising exercise for the green spaces of the capital than a serious attempt to add it to the family of British national parks. Indeed it was promoted as a 'notional' park. Geopersona (talk) 18:30, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Remove table?

Since this content no longer constitutes a list for which tables are often used, I'm not sure there's much point to retaining a table - the remaining material - images, statistics and so forth would be better accompanying the text for the designated areas which sits below the table. What do others think? cheers

I quite like the table since it provides a synoptic view of each National Park. However, it would not worry me if the images were moved to their relevant sections in the text so that the table could be greatly simplified and become less obtrusive. The text for each park currently reads like a travel guide and several are rather gushing in their approach. I guess the text ought to reflect the original designation reasons together with any other key points identified by the individual park authority. Regards Velella ^{Velella Talk} 09:07, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Map

The map is out of date as since 2016 the Lake District and the Yorkshire Dales are larger than they were originally plus would it not be better to have a map of the current administrative or ceremonial areas rather than the historic counties. Penrithguy (talk) 18:26, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the shortcomings of this map were noted above - the boundaries of Snowdonia and the Brecon Beacons are also incorrect and Cairngorms is rather larger than this map shows. I may yet see if I can provide anything better myself if nobody else does but it may not happen soon! thanks Geopersona (talk) 16:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Describing restrictions on these designated landscapes

The lede currently has it that the UK's national parks are areas of outstanding landscape where habitation and commercial activities are restricted. That is unsatisfactory insofar as there is a very large amount of commercial activity conducted within the UK's national parks just as there is a large amount of habitation - consider the outdoor activity retail and adventure tourism operators within Snowdonia or the Lakes for starters). Without further detail (and yes this is the lede so expansion can take place elsewhere) the reader unfamiliar with the UK's national parks might think the habitation and commercial activity is much more restricted than it is. Settlements within national parks continue to grow, building still takes place, though planning restrictions are a little tighter than elsewhere and certain forms of development would not be expected to gain permission. We can equally say that habitation and commercial activities are restricted within the rest of the country - that too is true, without specifying the extent to which policies exert varying degrees of control over these matters. All that said, we've had open-cast mining^[1], conifer afforestation, dual carriageway construction, erection of lines of pylons, HEP development and reservoir construction within various of the UK's national parks since their designation. We should find an improved, referenced description of the degree of protection afforded to these landscapes. thanks Geopersona (talk) 08:57, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As it is in the lede, can we not simply say that developments of all sorts are subject to significantly more stringent controls than in other areas, and with special protection for those aspects which led to the designation of the area. Regards Velella ^{Velella Talk} 09:11, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly, something along those lines. Geopersona (talk) 09:29, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "Inspection REPORT FOR DEVELOPMENT CONTROL BOARD 12TH NOVEMBER 2001 C6/243 Inspection of Brynhenllys Opencast Site". Carms CC. Retrieved 13 June 2020.

Table again

In the 'list of' section (4.2), I'm not really sure how useful the second column is which indicates 'wider region' Some of the links simply point to the article already linked in the previous column or else linked in the fourth column whilst others are only partly relevant. It could be improved - or it could be removed. Geopersona (talk) 05:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "Inspection REPORT FOR DEVELOPMENT CONTROL BOARD 12TH NOVEMBER 2001 C6/243 Inspection of Brynhenllys Opencast Site". Carms CC. Retrieved 13 June 2020.

[1]