Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Child (archetype)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. Postdlf 07:00, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
A child prodigy might be a stock character, but I don't see how this is. Gazpacho 00:12, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Strong keep and expand. Equal footing to the other Jungian archetypes at archetype. Highly important and encyclopedic to psychology and literary studies. Samaritan 00:15, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Keep from nominator, knowing about the Jung connection helps. Gazpacho 00:17, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Keep but {{cleanup-context}} Kappa 07:56, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Cleanup as per Kappa. — P Ingerson - Talk - Contribs 13:34, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Keep per Kappa Klonimus 06:45, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I added a bit more info and a helpful link for 'archetype.' Paradiso 05:53, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per Samaritan. Binadot 19:05, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.