Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bioconservatism (0th nomination)

Bioconservatism was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to keep.

Looks like a neologism. Edward 18:19, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)

• Keep. The history of bioconservatism is a class lecture topic in philosophy at Oxford University. Two or three recent uses by U.S. News & World Report. A preponderance of hits talking about bioconservative "movement", "values", etc. shows it is more than a dictdef. A recently-coined word, yes, but in sufficiently widespread use, referring to an encyclopedic topic with no better name. Samaritan 18:50, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Keep: Sure does need expansion in a bad way, though, and the immediate comparison to "bioluddism" is alarmingly POV. Geogre 20:18, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Looks like the above voters have shown that it is not a mere neologism. --L33tminion | (talk) 22:01, Nov 25, 2004 (UTC)
• Keep it. [[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 06:08, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Intrigue 20:45, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.