Talk:Roots blower
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Requested move 27 October 2023
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved (closed by non-admin page mover) BegbertBiggs (talk) 17:54, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Roots-type supercharger → Roots blower – Incorrect name. Supercharging is only one application. This was moved years ago and any reasons for that were perhaps more obvious at the time. But it should also have been fixed years ago.
Roots blower would be favoured over Roots-type blower, per COMMONNAME.
BTW, 'Rootes' is just wrong, even though the name has gone through that at one time. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:02, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom, although "Roots-type" would also be acceptable, as not every Roots blower is manufactured by the Roots Blower Company. However, we have Edison screw, Fowler flap, Weston cell, etc, so the genericized trademark is probably OK here. Incidentally, I don't think there was ever any connection between Roots blowers and the Rootes Group, although it's a common confusion. Tevildo (talk) 15:12, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.