Talk:Candide (operetta)

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Opera, a group writing and editing Wikipedia articles on operas, opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project discussion page is a place to talk about issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!OperaWikipedia:WikiProject OperaTemplate:WikiProject OperaOpera articles

Musical Theatre

Candide (operetta) is part of WikiProject Musical Theatre, organized to improve and complete musical theatre articles and coverage on Wikipedia. You can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Musical TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject Musical TheatreTemplate:WikiProject Musical TheatreMusical Theatre articles

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

The original text of this article was a version of this writeup posted on Everything2 modified for Wikipedia. --Paradoxian 14:34, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Version?

The text mentions several versions. Does anyone know which one was used in the Lonny Price/New York Philharmonic production mentioned in the text? -- 19:10, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Brahms

Once of the recent rewrites removed my annotation that Bernstein borrowed the second theme to Brahms' Serenade No. 1 for Orchestra for the Candide Overture. This is little mentioned, but easily verifiable - unless it's somehow believed that Brahms borrowed the theme from Bernstein. Isn't there a place for this information?

As I understand it, the Wikipedia philosophy is to avoid reproducing original research. If this is a documented example of Bernstein borrowing from Brahms, then by all means put it in, with an appropriate citation. If this is something you have discovered, then Wikipedia is out of luck until you publish this somewhere. If this is only a coincidence, and not a documented example of B's borrowing from B, then you could certainly note the resemblance here on the talk page. I have done so with a similar situation in Sondheim's A Little Night Music; see the discussion page for that show and you'll see how I did it. Of course, others may well know more about how this gets handled on WP than I do...P.S., please sign your posts too! Either click the signature button at the top of the edit window or manually put in four tildes. --Wspencer11 (talk to me...) 20:38, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Natalie Dessay again

In addition to the clip here, Dessay recorded a very different performance of GLITTER AND BE GAY with the London Symphony in 2006. In that one she parodied an operatic mad scene, ending up with a scream on the A-flat above high C (practically a record high note). It goes to show how versatile the music can be. CharlesTheBold 02:42, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Candide playbill.jpg

Image:Candide playbill.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:10, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. J. Van Meter (talk) 14:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Differences?

Is it worth putting in a bit about how the opera differs from the book? Roscelese (talk) 06:07, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On that note, I wonder if it might be a good idea to discuss the differences between versions? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.244.205.90 (talk) 20:35, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Plot summary

WikiProject Opera requires us to have a plot summary. Anyone willing to take on this daunting task, considering how many versions of Candide there are? --Paradoxian (talk) 05:19, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly the plot summary should be of Bernstein's 1989 "final" version, no?Paul (talk) 02:52, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for joining the discussion at a very late time, but a synopsis has been written. Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 19:26, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Candide (operetta). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:45, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Roles

Section 3 Roles is incomplete. Some minor roles are omitted. The Wikipedia practice for operas seems to be inclusion of all the minor roles. See http://www.sondheimguide.com/Candide/82nyco.html Rdmoore6 (talk) 22:12, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to add more roles, but maintain that section's current format of including details about various versions, preferably with sources. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 04:37, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]