Jump to content

Talk:2 Become 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article2 Become 1 has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 1, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
November 17, 2007Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Untitled

[edit]

Should an article like this rather be included within a subsection of the band's page and then have the title redirect to the band's page?--Fuzzball! 00:13, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

That was done ages ago. DrippingInk 16:28, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:2become1-uscd2.jpg

[edit]

Image:2become1-uscd2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:32, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA pass

[edit]
  • Some refs are reused heavily in the "Chart performance" section - you could trim down on the reuse and just have the ref at the end of the paragraph
  • "Sometimes the closing scene would not be shown on television due to the song fading out to an instrumental which lasts for forty seconds." - Ref, and it's a standalone sentence, move to a paragraph
  • Avoid wikilinking individual years.

If you have an issue with this review, you can request a reassessment. If you are happy with it, please consider reviewing another GA candidate. Cheers, Dihydrogen Monoxide ♫ 09:17, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Dihydrogen Monoxide ♫ 09:17, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Composition

[edit]

I would suggest removing much of the first paragraph – for starters, the piece is hardly in E-flat minor for its entirety. Many of the chords referenced are ridiculous, and their enharmonic equivalents should be given. Please ignore the references given: there are no excuses for badly spelled chords. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.5.55.131 (talk) 01:28, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2 Become 1. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:18, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on 2 Become 1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:33, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2_Become_1&oldid=1217281108"