Talk:2004

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2004 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Years High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Millie Bobby Brown

The addition doesn't technically violate WP:RY, but there are no other birth entries in WP:Recent years where the person was not notable at birth. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 21:43, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your point? The Rambling Man (talk) 21:51, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:IAR and the local consensus established in WT:RY suggests exclusion. Unlike certain other editors, I realize WP:RY is a guideline, and I am requesting consensus here to override the guideline in this instance. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 22:25, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, yes, as you keep saying, and we'll deal with your personal attacks at another venue, but you haven't actually said why this individual should be included. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:21, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

She's definitely not the only person who wasn't notable at birth in recent year articles; she's not even the only one in 2004 (Francesca Capaldi in 2004, Pierce Gagnon in 2005, Jacob Tremblay in 2006, and Aubrey Anderson-Emmons in 2007, not to mention all the ones in 2002 and 2003). What is the local consensus for exclusion that you're referring to? If the guideline is be interpreted as only people whose births were notable, then we would have to make that more explicit in the guideline itself. -- Irn (talk) 17:07, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was opposed to inclusion, as I don't consider her "internationally significant". But, without another point in the guideline or guideline discussion against her, I don't want to encourage arguments of the form: "She isn't internationally known." "She is." "Isn't." "Is." .... If noone else comes forward to agree with me that a specific clause of the guideline WP:RY applies, I'll withdraw the request. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 19:52, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why aren't you responding to the ANI request? The Rambling Man (talk) 19:54, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As I told you, I cannot easily copy diffs. (If I could, I would have pointed you to the three diffs where I told you that.) If you do not hide this discussion, I'll add it to the list of diffs where you are intentionally disruptive. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 22:46, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2004. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170104031911/http://europa.eu/scadplus/constitution/introduction_en.htm to http://europa.eu/scadplus/constitution/introduction_en.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:28, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Forrest Wheeler

Well, he does have an article, but both WP:NACTOR and WP:BLP1E suggest he shouldn't. I'm posting here to suggest that even if the article is retained, he may not have sufficient notability for this article. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 01:06, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Eclipses

See WT:YEARS#Eclipses for a matter relevant to this page. Arthur Rubin (alternate) (talk) 23:09, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Zayed-bin-Sultan-Al-Nahyan.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:21, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Marlon Brando (cropped).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:05, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Collage thoughts

Please let me know if anyone has any disagreements on the images included in the collage, and I will put it up for vote. Thanks The ganymedian (talk) 22:46, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

2004 Events Collage.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nintendo DS

If anyone can find a good source about the launch of the Nintendo DS, PLEASE ADD IT. Cause it is 2nd best selling game console ever. (The first being the PS2, which came out in 2000.) And that is for sure something significant. NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 21:23, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This shouldn't be included in the main article, it should be included in 2004 in video gaming instead, but I think this could be included in the collage if it is possible. MarioJump83 (talk) 17:04, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding some events

I have removed these events previously in this article as they are domestic, but also the ones that shouldn't be considered in the article as they are related to the sporting events, which are rarely included besides Olympics or World Cup, and/or television. MarioJump83 (talk) 17:08, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"January 7, 2004" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect January 7, 2004 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 3 § January 7, 2004 until a consensus is reached. TartarTorte 14:28, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Collage depreciation

At Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Years#Lead_image, a discussion on whether to depreciate collages in general in going on. Please share your thoughts. Koopinator (talk) 07:40, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]