Talk:Caste War of Yucatán
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comment
[edit]User:Infrogmation, I changed latino to republican in several places because it is my understanding that latino is customarily used to refer to Hispanics living in the US. Hispanic didn't seem right either, since Mexico was already a republic at that point, but republican might not be the exactly correct term either. Anyway, nice article! -- Viajero 13:24, 29 Sep 2003 (UTC)
- Thanks. The best terminology is a bit of a problem. The Merida side was Spanish speaking with a government controled by Creoles of Spanish ancestry. Nelson Reed's book on the war uses "Ladino" to refer to them, which Reed says has been objected to by some, but no better more acceptable term was suggested. Hm. The Maya called them "Dzulob". -- Infrogmation 17:47, 29 Sep 2003 (UTC)
Why the Caste War?
- The three "castes" in Yucatan were -
- The European aristocrats and landowners primarly of Spanish colonial heritage
- The Maya "hidalgos" probably related to the pre-colonial native nobilty and accorded privileges and status by the Europeans
- The mass of the Maya people who were essentially an exploited and oppressed population. It was this caste that carried on the war.
Interesting article, more like this! Its not even mentioned in an expensive offline encyclopaedia i just checked, thanks to you and Wikipedia for the article Isthatyou 02:37, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Useless section: "Cozumel"
[edit]There needs to be more signifigant material added to that section, or else it should be removed and that ONE sentence added to another section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.160.35.227 (talk) 22:47, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed that the isolated section wasn't contributing to the article, and have removed it. Some future expansion to the article can presumably address any significant displacements of populations. --cjllw ʘ TALK 23:54, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Very Important. Is Not Caste, Is Breed.
[edit]The real name in Spanish is "Guerra de Castas"
The Name Caste War i absolutly Wrong.... it wasn't a War of puryty an virginal behavor, it was a war of Races and social status... a war of indians vs whites.
Casta = Raza.
Casta means Lineage or Breed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ximbal (talk • contribs) 20:32, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what definition you're using for "caste", but that is absolutely the appropriate word to describe a combination of "Races and social status". "Breed War" would make no sense in English; "Race War" might work, but "Caste War" works better. Binabik80 (talk) 00:00, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- Whether or not one wishes to argue about the best translation "Caste War" has been the standard English name for decades, well established in English language literature on the subject. -- Infrogmation (talk) 22:57, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Caste War of Yucatán. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030802142205/http://www.planeta.com/ecotravel/mexico/yucatan/tales/0303yucatan.html to http://www.planeta.com/ecotravel/mexico/yucatan/tales/0303yucatan.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061016190749/http://www.planeta.com/ecotravel/mexico/yucatan/tales/0409castewar.html to http://www.planeta.com/ecotravel/mexico/yucatan/tales/0409castewar.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:55, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
side of UK in the war
[edit]the infobox puts the UK & british honduras on the mexican side only. that doesn't do justice to the complexity of the war as far as i understand the rest of the article. something like 1847-1893 economic & military support on the mayan side, and after that on the mexican one might be more accurate, for example. i suggest somebody with in-depth expertise to edit and substantiate the infobox accordingly. EnTerbury (talk) 12:53, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in History
- B-Class vital articles in History
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- B-Class Mexico articles
- Low-importance Mexico articles
- WikiProject Mexico articles
- B-Class Indigenous peoples of the Americas articles
- Low-importance Indigenous peoples of the Americas articles
- Indigenous peoples of the Americas articles
- B-Class Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- Low-importance Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America articles