Wikipedia talk:Project namespace
Appearance
This is not the page to ask for help or make test edits.
To make test edits, please use the Sandbox. For other help, please see our main help page. |
Text has been copied to or from this page; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
|
|
Information pages should have a slightly different design
Wiki information pages and other "metawiki" content pages should have a slighly different design, say, a lightgrey backgroud, to discourage people who accidentaly stumble upon one thinking it is a wiki article. This is just a suggestion, not a strongly held opinion or anything like that. Kemik0297 (talk) 18:07, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- It's a good idea. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 18:27, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- If you use the MonoBook skin, rather than the default Vector-2022, it already does this. The stylesheet for MonoBook includes these rules: which essentially says "Set the background colour for all pages to #F8FCFF. If the page is in article space, override this and set the background colour to white." The colour
div#content, div#p-cactions li a:hover, div#p-cactions li.selected a, div#content div.thumb { background-color: #F8FCFF; } .ns-0 div#content, .ns-0 div#p-cactions li a:hover, .ns-0 div#p-cactions li.selected a, .ns-0 div#content div.thumb { background-color: white; }
#F8FCFF
is , a very pale blue. Some other Wikipedias use other colours, such as French Wikipedia, which sets the background for talk pages (namespace 1) to#FFE
, , a light yellow. But this is really a matter for WP:VPR. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:50, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- If you use the MonoBook skin, rather than the default Vector-2022, it already does this. The stylesheet for MonoBook includes these rules: