User talk:Android79/TalkArchive002

Vfd main page vandalism

I don't know what's going on. Is someone using RickK's account? He's been one of the most sensible posters around. I've been gone for a few hours. Please give me an update. I can't even look at that photo without feeling physically sick and I only saw it for less than a second. Moncrief 01:05, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)

Heh...just happened to see your comment. Not User:RickK, just a "clever" impersonator—User:RiçkK—note the...um, the...whatever you call a c with a little thingee under it. ; ) Postdlf 01:16, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Are any actions being taken against that impersonator? Thanks for clarifying that. Moncrief 01:28, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)

Yes, someone else already blocked them indefinitely. Postdlf 01:34, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I'm not sure that I could adequately describe it, as I instinctively turned away from it immediately. But I saw enough of it to get a sense that it was a series of horrifying photos of mutilated body parts, maybe whole bodies, animals, and so on. So, I guess the answer is no: you don't want it described to you. :) Moncrief 01:44, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)

Vandalism...

Sorry you have to get involved. I have apologized to Master Thief. Quite simply, I did not know the "rule" of Wikipedia, and his/her comments were especially belittling and harsh, and so I responded as I did. Sorry.

Thanks

In appreciation for you pointing out the vandal ZScout370 to me, I wish to give you the WikiThanks. I owe you one. Zscout370 (talk) 01:47, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Glad to help. Is it just me, or has vandalism like this gotten a whole lot worse lately? android↔talk 01:51, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
- It has gotten worse in the past few months, but the reversions are very quick (from a span of 2-5 minutes). Zscout370 (talk) 01:53, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

VFD -> CSD

I personally don't think it's appropriate to put a CSD on a VfD page. VfD pages are never candidates for speedy deletion. Rick K 05:20, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)

Image on VfD

Howdy. You appear to be trying to list Image:100 7065.JPG on VfD; however, it hasn't worked. WP:IFD is the proper place to nominate images and other media for deletion. If you don't mind, I'll fix the VfD page. android↔talk 03:25, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks! --Briangotts 14:19, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Political Beefstew

I've come up with a quick draft at User:Meelar/Test of Political Significance. What would you add/leave out? I'd appreciate your suggestions and thoughts. Best, Meelar (talk) 00:01, May 12, 2005 (UTC)

Willie Morris Bioff

I've expanded the page somewhat. -- BD2412 ^thimk 19:10, 2005 May 13 (UTC)

User:Superdude115

I am starting to become a little worried about Superdude115's recent edits. He was really good for a while about not creating cruft, but recently he has been creating a lot of policy pages, and the edits to articles are seeming less relevant than before... I will try to keep a close eye on him again. Just a heads up, as I know you were also active monitoring him during his RFC. Too bad Lucky6.9 is gone... --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 22:22, May 13, 2005 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I haven't had time lately to keep an eye on him. It is a shame that Lucky is absent, since he was always so patient. I'll take a look if I have time tonight. android↔talk 23:13, May 13, 2005 (UTC)

WP:VIP

Hey, I would see this if I was you. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 01:04, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just going to have to chalk this one up to language comprehension issues. There's no way someone could be this belligerent and not be a troll. android↔talk 01:13, May 14, 2005 (UTC)
- I will give up until tomorrow, since I am at my 3 revert threshold, and there is nothing much more I can prove. People still can find the page listed on the VFD page, so I think other users can try and add the VFD notice back in. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 01:20, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - What are you reverting? If he's removing the VfD notice, that's clear vandalism (how ironic) and the 3RR doesn't apply, IIRC. android↔talk 01:24, May 14, 2005 (UTC)
    - Knowing what this user has done, I am not going to take my chances. Plus, I am busy with my girlfriend, so this problem can wait. I probably spent almost two hours on this whole situation. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 01:28, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
      - I'll make him aware of the 3RR; he's reverted ~~many more times than~~ 3 times already. android↔talk 01:29, May 14, 2005 (UTC)
        There was also a version of this article, created at Iranian Physics News, perhaps to get around the VFD process. I made it a redirect into the article that is up for VFD. If that happens again, and the article has been deleted already, it can be speedied for reincarnation. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 01:32, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Yikes, quite the mess, isn't it? He seems to have stopped for at least a few minutes. Maybe the Talk page messages finally got through. It does look like there are at some language issues at work—though I'm impressed that he managed to find WP:VIP so quickly.... --TenOfAllTrades (talk/contrib) 02:23, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I did list the IP this user was using at VIP, for mainly blanking out comments, and I posted a test template on it's talk page. I guess that is why things went to Hell. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 02:24, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

redirects

I've deleted the two redirects — they were speedy candidates. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 22:35, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You're probably right, I should have tried that first. It's been awhile since I encountered a not-useful redirect. However, WP:CSD doesn't explicitly list a criterion for redirects that really applies to those... no "nonsense redirect" or the like. Perhaps it should? android↔talk 22:49, May 17, 2005 (UTC)

Urps, you're right (about VfD)

Should have done my research. I apologized to 10qwerty, thanks for pointing it out. :D Ambush Commander 01:01, May 18, 2005 (UTC)