Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Streamium

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. -- AllyUnion (talk) 15:51, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Streamium

Advert for non-notable product. RJFJR 01:23, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)

Delete advertising CDC (talk) 01:46, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC) Looks better now. CDC (talk) 07:09, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete, it is currently not-notable. Zzyzx11 06:41, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete advertising Mgm|^(talk) 08:49, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)
Keep, if you actually knew what Streamium is you'd know that it's certainly not 'non-notable', which isn't a defined grounds for deletion anyway. The page is just a harmless stub that will grow in time (much like how all of Wikipedia started out as). Dan100 13:34, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)
Keep major electronics line by a very major manufacturer (Philips). 76,900 Google hits. We have articles for loads of obscure cel phones, computers, and other gadgetry, we certainly should have one for this as well. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:38, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)
Keep, despite its POV nature, it is notable. --Sn0wflake 18:23, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Keep, zap the PoV. Wyss 21:19, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Keep. I cleaned it up. JoaoRicardo 02:34, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Looks OK after the cleanup. Good job, JoaoRicardo. Carrp | Talk 18:01, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Keep now, thanks JoaoRicardo. —RaD Man (talk) 02:18, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Keep, Now that it has a NPOV, we should expand and wikify it. Bratsche 04:49, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Keep -- Robert Pendray 09:46, Feb 20, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.