User talk:Wikiwikifast
Hello Wikiwikifast, welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to join the community. Drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log so we can meet you and help you get started. If you need editing help, visit Wikipedia:How to edit a page. For format questions, visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Newcomers' Village pump. And of course, feel free to talk with me or ask questions on my talk page. Enjoy! --Αλεξ Σ 21:46, 9 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Hi, just wanted to say nice job cleaning up Tea. Your other contributions to Wikipedia also look useful. Keep up the good work! Wmahan. 05:02, 2004 Apr 25 (UTC)
- Thanks! --Wikiwikifast 14:03, 25 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Meanness
[edit]Perhaps I should ask you to explain what makes you think I am mean to Tkorrovi. Paul Beardsell 04:42, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- I was browsing through the AC talk archives, and I am beginning to understand why you are annoyed at him... However, I found your remarks about his being Estonian offensive and unnecessary. Wikiwikifast 02:46, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Wiki, I’m in the middle of an edit of the Tractatus article – hence the structure I added. I’d like to keep it, adding items explaining each Section. So I’ll rv. your recent edits. More explanation in the talk page when I have time. Banno 02:12, May 8, 2004 (UTC)
This is the English Wikipedia
[edit]Regarding to the Sailor Moon discussion, the names SHOULD be moved to the English names. This is the English wikipedia, and no English-language "production" has the names in the original Japanese (both the dubbed anime and the translated Manga change the names; I want to go with TokyoPop's names). Likwise with Yu-Gi-Oh and Dragon Ball Z, the manga of both cartoons uses the Japanese names, so the characters from those two shows use the Japanese names. WhisperToMe 06:01, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I may move 'em (the Sailor Moon names) back to the English TokyoPop names in a moment. When you moved them back to the Japanese names, you didn't redirect the other redirects I set up, which means they all got broken. WhisperToMe 06:20, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Metaphysical subjectivism
[edit]There is currently some question about why you added the NPOV notice to the page Metaphysical subjectivism. It will be taken down unless you explain your reasoning on the talk page. Thanks. -Seth Mahoney 20:55, Sep 17, 2004 (UTC)
Subject (philosophy)
[edit]Why redirect this to subjectivism? Obviously, one need not be a subjectivist to believe that subject (in the relevant sense) exist! It would have made more sense to redirect to subjectivity. But I don't see what's wrong with calling the article subject. Michael Hardy 01:35, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Yes, that makes more sense. Could you move the whole thing to subjectivity instead? I think the term subject is less common than subjectivity, and subjectivity is more general; hence everything should fall under subjectivity. Wikiwikifast 13:52, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Persistence of Memory.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:The Persistence of Memory.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jackaranga (talk) 14:31, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)