Jump to content

Talk:1960 Winter Olympics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article1960 Winter Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 26, 2011Good article nomineeListed
April 8, 2013Peer reviewReviewed
August 25, 2013Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Good article

Comment

[edit]

My info is that:

The Olympic Flame is lit in Squaw Valley at February 18 by the 1952 Olympic champion in 500 meter speed skating, Ken Henry. The games are opened by Vice President Richard Nixon. The fire from Morgedal is still burning in Squaw Valley. -- Egil

US Flag incorrect

[edit]

A 50 star US flag is shown in the medal table. This is incorrect - the US flew a 49-star flag from July 4 1959 until July 3 1960. [[User:Grutness|Grutness talk ]] 02:10, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)

So fixed — Michael J 20:11, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nordic events

[edit]

Talk amongst the Tahoe locals [1] is that the Nordic events were held at Sugar Pine Point State Park and surrounding environs. Bandy 17:31, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect facts

[edit]
  • The first televised winter games was the 1956 games. See [2] from the IOC for proof. H1nkles (talk) 16:38, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Giuliana Chenal-Minuzzo recited the athlete's oath at the 1956 Games. She was the first woman to do so per this link also from the IOC [3]. I will change these discrepencies.
  • Squaw Valley ski area is located in Olympic Valley, CA, not Squaw Valley, CA. Squaw Valley, CA is in central California, near Fresno. A simple check on the Squaw Valley Ski Corp. web site (www.squaw.com/contact-squaw-valley-usa) will clearly show their address as Squaw Valley Ski Corporation, P.O. Box 2007, 1960 Squaw Valley Road, Olympic Valley CA 96146. Why do the guardians of this entry insist in using the wrong city for the famous resort's address?

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:1960 Winter Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk) 14:26, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    The article is easy to read (as in it is clear) and the spelling and grammar are correct.
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
    Complies with the the manual of style guidelines.
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    Never mind
    B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
    Never mind
    C. It contains no original research:
    No sign of original research.
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    All the important stuff seems to be covered in the article
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
    Everything seems to stay on topic
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
    Everything looks stable
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    Images are properly tagged
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
    Images are where they are supposed to be and captions "agree" with photos.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:


Just dropping in, leads are not supposed to have references unless quotes or controversial BLP statements are in the lead, so the article's fine in that regard. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:05, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by Ryan Vesey
This is ridiculous. WP:LEADCITE makes it clear that inline citations are only necessary in the lead if it is a BLP. Ryan Vesey Review me! 15:06, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Passed the article because everything else is fine.--Dom497 (talk) 15:09, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wonderful! Thank you for your review. H1nkles (talk) citius altius fortius 15:54, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ann Heggtveit 1960.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Ann Heggtveit 1960.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:05, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greece in the opening ceremonies

[edit]

It was mentioned that the Greek standardbearer (as always) led the procession of athletes into the Opening Ceremonies. However, Greece is not shown as having participated in these Games officially. Did Greece just send a non-athlete flag bearer, was the Greek flagbearer not even Greek from from the Olympic Committee? Was the story about the Greek flag leading in the athletes even true? Enquiring minds think this article should elucidate on that. --Canuckguy (talk) 19:36, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1960 Winter Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:20, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Gave CBS the idea for instant replay"

[edit]

This is sourced to a single statement on IOC's web page about Squaw Valley. It seems dubious and poorly sourced. I couldn't find any good sourcing for this statement; in fact, most of the internet that mentions Squaw Valley and instant replay together seems to have gotten that opinion directly from this article, sometimes word-for-word. The instant replay page itself, which is well-sourced, does not even mention Squaw Valley. It seems like a TV urban legend that has made its way into this article and I believe it should be removed. ArchieOof (talk) 17:05, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]