Talk:Pretorian Guard

From VfD:

• Delete. spelling, all links moved to Praetorian Guard Philip Baird Shearer 21:27, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Abstain. Redirects aren't for article linkage, they're for searches, and likely spelling errors should be kept as redirs. That said, we don't need both cases, and lowercase will get people to the article faster. However, since it's been in existence for 13 months, it theoretically could be linked to from outside. Niteowlneils 22:01, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Completely invalid VfD candidate. The article was a redirect before Phillip blanked it and put the VfD notice there. Should only have been posted to WP:RFD. Keep and retain as redirects - these would be considered very common misspellings [1]. -- Netoholic @ 22:33, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Keep, of course. -Sean Curtin 23:17, Sep 8, 2004 (UTC)
• Keep harmless redirect. See comment below. Rossami 23:19, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• keep. Mikkalai 23:29, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Philip - Take a look at Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion. If you want to pursue this, you should do it there. But for now, do we have your permission to remove these requests from the VfD page? -- Netoholic @ 00:21, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion

Start a discussion about improving the Pretorian Guard page

Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Pretorian Guard" page.

Start a discussion