Talk:TBA (disambiguation)
Appearance
This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
from VfD
[edit]Just a dicdef. Has an exact clone in Wicktionary. ClockworkTroll 22:00, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, or Redirect to To be determined. -- Infrogmation 22:07, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Obviously, I should have included my edit summary as a comment in the source (I had it coming, I guess...). Yes, I know of the Wiktionary items (actually, I wrote them), but I made this article to make sure TBA would be listed in Category:TLAs along with TBC and TBD (#redirects won't do the job). In my edit summary, I noted this, of course. Sorry for not informing of this more visibly. --Wernher 22:41, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. We're not a copy of wictionary. --Improv 04:20, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Redirect to To be determined —siroχo 05:01, Oct 13, 2004 (UTC)
- Um, why was it important to get it in the category? I don't get it. Categories aren't really supposed to be reading material per se. I may be missing something, but I thought categories were supposed to serve articles, and not the other way around. Delete. Geogre 05:08, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- The way I see it, checking category pages gives the reader a good overview of the articles on the subject field in question. Obviously, when reading an article and noticing the categories it's in, a click on one of them will provide other articles in that category, which may be very useful information. However, I will settle for a Redirect; after all, the TBx-articles point to each other. --Wernher 14:13, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)
I'll do a #redirect to settle(?) the matter; that'll point readers the right way using ~0 wiki-storage. --Wernher 02:19, 16 Oct 2004 (UTC)
end moved discussion
- "~0 wiki-storage" →Wikipedia:Don't worry about performance Torzsmokus 20:33, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
To Be Announced or To Be Ascertained?
[edit]Just which one is it? :S82.36.244.186 (talk) 14:45, 11 June 2008 (UTC)