Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Insite Incentive AB
Insite Incentive AB was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete.
Pure advertising listing. --Calton 04:38, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. If the initial description doesn't give it away, the use of "we" throughout the article certainly does. Gsd97jks 04:54, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Also, copyvio: taken straight from [1]. Aerion//talk 05:07, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete spam Cdc 06:57, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. We are so incompetent we don't even bother to say what country we are located in. -- Paul Richter 08:34, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Ad. utcursch 09:22, Dec 13, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Copyvio or advertising about a Swedish company. I'm Swedish and have never heard fo this company, but I'm not that interested in economy and companies. Jeltz 11:33, 2004 Dec 13 (UTC)
- Delete: Pure ad. Why, I wonder, do all these firms offer "solutions?" What if I'm not a chemist? Geogre 16:29, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, advertising. Katefan0 19:45, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, ad. Wyss 12:19, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.