User talk:Rend~enwiki
Here are some links I thought useful:
- Wikipedia:Tutorial
- Wikipedia:Help desk
- M:Foundation issues
- Wikipedia:Policy Library
- Wikipedia:Utilities
- Wikipedia:Cite your sources
- Wikipedia:Verifiability
- Wikipedia:Wikiquette
- Wikipedia:Civility
- Wikipedia:Conflict resolution
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Wikipedia:Pages needing attention
- Wikipedia:Peer review
- Wikipedia:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
- Wikipedia:Brilliant prose
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures
- Wikipedia:Boilerplate text
- Wikipedia:Current polls
- Wikipedia:Mailing lists
- Wikipedia:IRC channel
Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have. Wikipedia:About, Wikipedia:Help desk, and Wikipedia:Village pump are also
a place to go for answers to general questions. To read up on the latest wikinews,
have a look at the Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost.
You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.
(Sam Spade | talk | contributions) 00:06, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Abundance of the chemical elements in organisms
[edit]Hi Rend, you added a table to the article, with data from the book Biochemistry by Mary K. Campbell, Shawn O. Farrell. You wrote that the numbers are "number of atoms for a thousand carbon atoms". Looking at the numbers, I don't think that is true, it's more likely the mass per 1000 mass units of carbon and not atoms per 1000 atoms. Icek 15:34, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- See also Talk:Abundance_of_the_chemical_elements#Abundance_of_the_chemical_elements_in_organisms. A carbon atom has about 12 times the mass of a hydrogen atom. Even disregarding the water and looking only at the organic compounds in organisms, the number of hydrogen atoms is certainly larger than 1/4 the number of carbon atoms. If it were not the number of atoms but the mass of the hydrogen that is 8 - 25 % of the mass of carbon, then the number of hydrogen atoms would be 96 - 300 % of the number of carbon atoms, which is certainly closer to reality. But the number for oxygen also seems to be too low as most organisms consist mainly of water. Icek 13:03, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Re:Laplacian
[edit]I replied at Talk:Laplace operator. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 05:38, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed
[edit]Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Rend. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Rend~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
02:22, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Renamed
[edit]This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
18:02, 22 April 2015 (UTC)