Talk:End-of-life product

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Usage outside of computing

EOL isn't a term "in computing", it's a general retailing term and can be applied to anything

Sorry. I didn't know -- edited slightly. Thanks for pointing it out :) Dysprosia 12:07, 20 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Much improved. Please excuse my grumpiness - hard day at the office. :) Tannin

Unnecessarily derogatory?

Microsoft may be a prominent example of setting EOL dates, but doesn't 'notorious' imply that seting EOL dates is a bad thing? If a business is expected to support its products indefinitely, that incurs continuous expense with diminishing returns, thus raising expenses in other areas. This is bad both for the business and the consumers, to whom the expense of perpetual support almost certainly falls. --Mattmcc 21:35, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

True. Why is Microsoft treated here? They do nothing out of the ordinary and it does not clarify the subject. Andries (talk) 10:15, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because the way MS does it is horrible! 25 July 2024 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.64.6.83 (talk) 12:43, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Product support - out of context

Product support is a different phase of engineering life cycle - that's a maintenance phase, not EOL. I think the article needs to point out that there is a cost for every phase of life-cycle, with EOL cost needing to be planned. --71.245.164.83 (talk) 01:49, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

End-of-life & end-of-support

These are often considered two different terms, where EOL describes the point of no-sale, and EOS describes the point of no support. The article currently merges their definitions. Tule-hog (talk) 17:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]