Jump to content

Talk:WQHT

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Opening comments

[edit]
what a trashy station

Hacked Junk



This page should be deleted, it is an incoherent mess, with half-sentences and fake words all over it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.127.228.170 (talk) 10:37, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]



  • Is anyone going to write about the controversy of the Tsunami Song?
  • Hi. Maybe there is no need to over-linkify the article ? It makes it hard to read, and does not necessariliy add informations. Bye bye! Gtabary 21:06, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)


  • Why can't I change "claims to be the premier commercial Hip-Hop station" to "arguably the premier..."? Sure there are big stations like Power 106 for Westcoast rap, KMEL for Bay Area rap,etc. But even those stations can't deny that for commercial mainstream rap Hot 97 is at the forefront.

-3/25/06

Fair use rationale for Image:Hot97logo.PNG

[edit]

Image:Hot97logo.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:59, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Original Hot 97 logo.jpg

[edit]

Image:Original Hot 97 logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:21, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Old Hot97 logo.jpg

[edit]

Image:Old Hot97 logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:26, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was No move. Enough already, we get the point. 199.125.109.126 (talk) 18:19, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WQHT → Hot 97 — The station, perhaps the most popular hip hop music radio station, is far better known by the name Hot 97, and, simply put, our naming conventions advice to use most common names. I think this should almost be uncontroversial. Thanks — Do U(knome)? yes...or no 01:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

[edit]
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
Google News Archive search for "Hot 97". At page 13, I still haven't found anything but the New York hip hop station. Do U(knome)? yes...or no 07:11, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strongest Oppose Possible - Rarely do I agree with JPG-GR, but this time I do. There are 8 stations with some variation of "Hot 97" in it's branding. Changing this station from WQHT to Hot 97 would be completely ignoring our naming conventions and the rules of WP:WPRS and would open a can of worms we would never get closed. This is a bad, bad idea. - NeutralHomer • Talk • January 20, 2009 @ 00:53
  • Strong Oppose - Wikipedia's naming conventions incorporate the sub-conventions for broadcasting, which clearly state that for countries using a call sign system, articles should be named using the call sign. It's enough that stations change their call signs and we have to bat them around like wiffle balls — can you imagine when Hot 97 begets Mix 97, begets Bob 97, begets Froggy 97, begets Mix 97 again? Oy… Mlaffs (talk) 03:33, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong oppose We already have an established naming convention for stations with call signs, there's nothing that leads me to believe that this station is any different from the hundreds of other stations, some with equally legendary branding, that are named by their call sign. It doesn't matter what comes up in google searches, if there are other stations using "Hot 97", then the redirect should be turned into a disambiguate page. Case in point, even being from Detroit I know that the most popular "Kiss FM" station is in Los Angeles. Yet the article is still named by it's call sign KIIS-FM and Kiss FM is a disambiguate. Are you stating WQHT's has some unique situation or something? RobDe68 (talk) 03:45, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Wikipedia:Naming conventions#Broadcasting. TJ Spyke 04:06, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose for the reasons given above, increased ambiguity and not IAW Wikipedia:Naming conventions#Broadcasting. I don't think that the proposer understands the difference between a radio station and its current format. --Bejnar (talk) 07:27, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Oppose as it would violate the black-letter policy of Wikipedia:Naming conventions#Broadcasting which is carefully crafted for maximum reliability, ease of access, and clarity for the reader. Station branding often changes frequently, is not reliably tracked for all U.S. stations, and is purely a marketing tool. Callsign changes for U.S. radio stations are generally infrequent (there are always outliers) and are all officially tracked by the FCC. - Dravecky (talk) 08:17, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Wikipedia naming conventions do not require "most common name" in all cases; they explicitly cite radio stations as a case where there are special issues that override the idea of using a "common" on-air branding name. Not everybody necessarily likes the call sign option, I grant, but using branding instead would create far more problems than it solves — and the idea that this station is uniquely entitled to special consideration in that regard is an absolute non-starter. Bearcat (talk) 10:20, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strongest Oppose Possible - Per all above. Stations should only have their branding as their name only if the station does NOT have an assigned call sign in North America. єmarsee (Discuss) 23:44, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

[edit]
Any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Why is radio station W264BT linking back to WQHT the two are not even directly affiliated or owned by the same person/company. In fact W264BT is owned by an individual, Just because WQHT simulcasts their signal doesn't mean that its owned by WQHT. I believe that W264BT should in fact have its own article. TheGoofyGolfer (talk) 04:58, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on WQHT. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:12, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on WQHT. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:07, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:WQHT&oldid=1203283420"